|

Part 2: Indie Ethics - and badgers
|
Once
you've abandoned the "must get signed" mindset, the
next obstacle is Indie Ethics - another subject on which the how-to
books stay strangely silent. Indie Ethics are a vague code of
practice that every band is expected to follow. Thou Shalt Not
Collaborate With The Man. Thou Shalt Not Mime On Television. Thou
Shalt Not Sell Records. That sort of thing. The reason the concept
is so popular is because it gives people an opportunity to slag
off your band for "selling out" - it sounds so much
better than telling the truth, which is that the person who's
slagging you doesn't like your haircut. The concept of indie ethics
is bollocks, of course, but it doesn't stop bands from agonising
over it.
The only
way to be in a band without compromising is to stay in your bedsit.
If you play a gig for money, you're working for The Man - you're only
there to help the venue sell beer. If you play a Tennent's Live venue
you're helping a drinks corporation target that oh-so-lucrative twentysomething
market. Appear in the NME and you're helping its parent company, IPC,
sell advertising (and stomp on journalists' rights, but that's another
story). When you post "sell out!" messages to a music board,
you're probably helping Server.com sell adverts. Everything you do is
a compromise.
The music
business is a business - if you don't want to be part of it, then don't
play gigs, don't make records, and don't bore everybody else with your
elitist nonsense. Personally I'd be willing to pull live badgers out
of my arse on the National Lottery Show if I thought it would result
in more people hearing Kasino's music.
Worrying
about whether you've sold out or not is a waste of valuable drinking
time.
Your genius
may be obvious to you and your band, but it might not be obvious to
anybody else. If you want people to like you, you need to work at it.
Some people will never like you. That's not a flaw on their part; nor
is it a flaw on yours. Accept it, get over it, and spend your time trying
to find people who will be more receptive. For indie bands, that means
four types of people: fanzines, publications, the broadcast media and
Web sites.
The people
who write fanzines (or E-Zines, the online equivalent) are quite possibly
insane. They don't get paid, they get sod-all respect, yet they devote
massive amounts of time and effort to reviewing gigs, interviewing bands
and listening to awful, awful demo tapes. Being reviewed in a fanzine
gives you two benefits: people who love music get to hear about you
(most fanzines are read by bands, gig-goers, journalists and so on),
and if it's a good review you can quote it in your biography or press
releases. Of course, there's a risk too: if a fanzine writer doesn't
like you, expect a demolition job. These are usually funny, so don't
take it personally. There's no such thing as bad publicity.
People
tend to underestimate local newspapers, which is a shame. Some of the
nicest people we know work for local rags, and they're usually very
enthusiastic about music (and desperately underpaid). Before you slag
off their coverage of live music in your area, bear in mind that it's
very difficult to persuade editors to cover local bands at all - readers
generally prefer to read recycled press releases about Britney Spears
and boy bands. Getting any local music in the local rag is a considerable
achievement, so help them out: keep them up to date with what you're
doing, and always think of an angle. Why should the paper write about
your band? The better the angle, the better the coverage.
|